Re: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 07/07/2015 13:18, Wu, Feng wrote:
> Then I still need assign prod and de-assign prod in
> irq_bypass_register_consumer/irq_bypass_unregister_consumer, Right?
> Would you please share why this is better.

The need to store the consumer->producer link seems to be unique to
posted interrupts.  It is difficult to say without seeing the PI code,
but I prefer to keep the bypass manager as small as possible.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/