RE: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control

[Wu, Feng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:22 PM
> To: Wu, Feng; Eric Auger; eric.auger@xxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx; marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx;
> alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx; mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx;
> joro@xxxxxxxxxx; b.reynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding
> control
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/07/2015 13:18, Wu, Feng wrote:
> > Then I still need assign prod and de-assign prod in
> > irq_bypass_register_consumer/irq_bypass_unregister_consumer, Right?
> > Would you please share why this is better.
> 
> The need to store the consumer->producer link seems to be unique to
> posted interrupts.  It is difficult to say without seeing the PI code,
> but I prefer to keep the bypass manager as small as possible.

Fine. I will follow your suggestion!

Thanks,
Feng

> 
> Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/