RE: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control
From: Wu, Feng
Date: Tue Jul 07 2015 - 07:33:50 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Feng
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:24 PM
> To: Paolo Bonzini; Eric Auger; eric.auger@xxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx; marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx;
> alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx; mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx;
> joro@xxxxxxxxxx; b.reynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx; Wu, Feng
> Subject: RE: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding
> control
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 7:22 PM
> > To: Wu, Feng; Eric Auger; eric.auger@xxxxxx;
> > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx; marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx;
> > alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx; mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > joro@xxxxxxxxxx; b.reynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding
> > control
> >
> >
> >
> > On 07/07/2015 13:18, Wu, Feng wrote:
> > > Then I still need assign prod and de-assign prod in
> > > irq_bypass_register_consumer/irq_bypass_unregister_consumer, Right?
> > > Would you please share why this is better.
> >
> > The need to store the consumer->producer link seems to be unique to
> > posted interrupts. It is difficult to say without seeing the PI code,
> > but I prefer to keep the bypass manager as small as possible.
>
> Fine. I will follow your suggestion!
If using the following changes, how can we assign 'prod', we need to use
container_of to get struct kvm_kernel_irqfd and then refer to 'prod', but
we cannot do this in irq_bypass_register_consumer(), right? It is a
common API. But we can only get the associated producer info inside
bypass manager, right?
Thanks,
Feng
struct kvm_kernel_irqfd {
......
struct irq_bypass_consumer cons;
struct irq_bypass_producer *prod;
};
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
> >
> > Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/