Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: enforce inlining for atomics

[Hagen Paul Pfeifer]

> On July 13, 2015 at 8:27 PM Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:

> > So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it),
> > we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic
> > ops) always inlined.
> 
> I will send more such force-inlining patches your way then.

Now? We discuss this a month back or so? :-)

Anyway, if so I prefer to group the patchset in at least two patches to
simplify review:

- performance criticial group
- inline assembler group

The former group contains all inline critical functions and the later to
identify functions where gcc has problems because their inline heuristic
for asm code is a toy.

Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/