Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: enforce inlining for atomics

[Denys Vlasenko]

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On July 13, 2015 at 8:27 PM Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>
>> > So I think the original patch makes sense (and I already applied it),
>> > we want known-simple and performance critical methods (such as atomic
>> > ops) always inlined.
>>
>> I will send more such force-inlining patches your way then.
>
> Now? We discuss this a month back or so? :-)

Not *your* way.
I meant that I'll send patches to Ingo - I see that he agrees that
this worth fixing instead of waiting for a better compiler.

(Ideally, the compiler shouldn't do this, but gcc BZ comments
are not encouraging).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/