Re: [PATCH] [4.2 fix] x86, mpx: do not set ->vm_ops on mpx VMAs
From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Mon Aug 03 2015 - 15:41:03 EST
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:19:14AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:34:28PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 02:29:58PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (sorry for the spam, I screwed up the stable@ address).
> > > >
> > > > BTW, thanks to Kirill for doing this patch! He posted it to LKML
> > > > but we need to ensure it is picked up for 4.2 and any -stable
> > > > kernels where this commit is applied:
> > > >
> > > > 6b7339f4: mm: avoid setting up anonymous pages into file mapping
> > > >
> > > > That broke MPX support because MPX sets a vma->vm_ops on an
> > > > anonymous VMA. We need this patch to make it work again,
> > > > basically removing MPX's use of ->vm_ops. Kirill made me aware
> > > > of this long ago, but I didn't double-check that his fix got
> > > > submitted and merged.
> > > >
> > > > I (Dave) fixed up a minor merge conflict and added the
> > > > try_unmap_single_bt() use of is_mpx_vma() (which were added
> > > > post-4.1).
> > > >
> > > > Note for -stable: The first hunk may not apply cleanly because of
> > > > other activity in arch/x86/mm/mmap.c, but should be trivial to
> > > > apply by hand. Hunk #5 on mpx.c is only present on 4.2-rc kernels.
> > >
> > > Can someone send a version that is known to apply, you don't want to
> > > rely on me to get it right :)
> >
> > Here it is.
> >
> > MPX support was introduced in 3.19, so it only need to be applied to
> > 4.1-stable.
>
> Thanks, now applied.
Just to make clear: we don't need MPX patch for older stables, but we
*do* need 6b7339f4 (mm: avoid setting up anonymous pages into file
mapping) to be ported into all stables.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/