Re: [RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq: Fix coding style issues
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Aug 24 2015 - 00:26:01 EST
On 23-08-15, 22:13, Muhammad Falak R Wani wrote:
> This patch introduces a blank line after declarations, which
> fix the checkpatch.pl warnings at 3 places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 8ae655c..5aea659 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ static ssize_t show_bios_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> {
> unsigned int limit;
> int ret;
> +
> if (cpufreq_driver->bios_limit) {
> ret = cpufreq_driver->bios_limit(policy->cpu, &limit);
> if (!ret)
> @@ -815,6 +816,7 @@ unlock:
> static void cpufreq_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> {
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = to_policy(kobj);
> +
> pr_debug("last reference is dropped\n");
> complete(&policy->kobj_unregister);
> }
> @@ -2129,6 +2131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor);
> int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy;
> +
> if (!policy)
> return -EINVAL;
We don't really need a patch for this, unless Rafael wants to apply
this one :)
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/