[PATCH v2] x86/calling.h: remove unused SAVE_ALL/RESTORE_ALL macros for !CONFIG_x86_64

From: Alexander Kuleshov
Date: Mon Aug 24 2015 - 07:36:54 EST


SAVE_ALL and RESTORE_ALL macros for !CONFIG_X86_64 were introduced in the
1a338ac32 commit (sched, x86: Optimize the preempt_schedule() call) and
were used in the ___preempt_schedule and ___preempt_schedule_context from
the arch/x86/kernel/preempt.S. But the arch/x86/kernel/preempt.S was
removed in the 0ad6e3c5 commit (x86: Speed up ___preempt_schedule*() by
using THUNK helpers) and ___preempt_schedule/___preempt_schedule_context
are reimplemeted and not used SAVE_ALL/RESTORE_ALL anymore.

These macros have no users anymore, so we can remove it.

Changelog:

v2: Check of the CONFIG_x86_64 returned as <calling.h> provides
functionality only for the x86_64.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/entry/calling.h | 33 ---------------------------------
1 file changed, 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
index f4e6308..c009cee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/calling.h
@@ -207,37 +207,4 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
.macro icebp
.byte 0xf1
.endm
-
-#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-
-/*
- * For 32bit only simplified versions of SAVE_ALL/RESTORE_ALL. These
- * are different from the entry_32.S versions in not changing the segment
- * registers. So only suitable for in kernel use, not when transitioning
- * from or to user space. The resulting stack frame is not a standard
- * pt_regs frame. The main use case is calling C code from assembler
- * when all the registers need to be preserved.
- */
-
- .macro SAVE_ALL
- pushl %eax
- pushl %ebp
- pushl %edi
- pushl %esi
- pushl %edx
- pushl %ecx
- pushl %ebx
- .endm
-
- .macro RESTORE_ALL
- popl %ebx
- popl %ecx
- popl %edx
- popl %esi
- popl %edi
- popl %ebp
- popl %eax
- .endm
-
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
-
--
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/