Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: add KASan support
From: Vladimir Murzin
Date: Mon Aug 24 2015 - 12:16:57 EST
On 24/08/15 17:00, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 2015-08-24 18:44 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx>:
>> Another option would be having "sparse" shadow memory based on page
>> extension. I did play with that some time ago based on ideas from
>> original v1 KASan support for x86/arm - it is how 614be38 "irqchip:
>> gic-v3: Fix out of bounds access to cpu_logical_map" was caught.
>> It doesn't require any VA reservations, only some contiguous memory for
>> the page_ext itself, which serves as indirection level for the 0-order
>> shadow pages.
> We won't be able to use inline instrumentation (I could live with that),
> and most importantly, we won't be able to use stack instrumentation.
> GCC needs to know shadow address for inline and/or stack instrumentation
> to generate correct code.
It's definitely a trade-off ;)
Just for my understanding does that stack instrumentation is controlled
>> In theory such design can be reused by others 32-bit arches and, I
>> think, nommu too. Additionally, the shadow pages might be movable with
>> help of driver-page migration patch series .
>> The cost is obvious - performance drop, although I didn't bother
>> measuring it.
>>  https://lwn.net/Articles/650917/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/