Re: [RFC 0/1] i2c: acpi: revert setting a "stable" device name
From: Dustin Byford
Date: Tue Aug 25 2015 - 01:03:44 EST
On Mon Aug 17 11:00, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> If I remember correctly ACPI ID should not ever change and instance id :xy
> after INTABCD:xy should also be visible and keep the order even if device is
> disabled or not plugged. But I'm not absolute sure about this.
> At least on a test platform that allow disable devices will show those
> devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status == 0).
I'm always surprised how hard it is to tell what *can't* happen in ACPI.
How about a conditional call to LoadTable()? Seems like that would mess
up the :xy. Moot point, I think you're on the right track in your RFC
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/