Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] dma: rename dma_*_writecombine() to dma_*_wc()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > There's a catch-22 issue here either way, for instance this rename patch has 
> > been being baked for probably 2 releases already but the difficulty has been 
> > trying to find the appropriate time to merge it without conflict.
> > 
> > If you do it in the beginning of the merge window, you have to ask yourself in 
> > what tree it will be done. Since subsystems are topic specific that means that 
> > subsystem will end up having a conflict at the end of the merge window.
> 
> Yes it's a special case.  I think the best way of handling such things is to get 
> them in to Linus either right at the end of the merge window or the day after he 
> releases -rc1.  This is when most people's trees are mostly empty.

Yes, that was the plan last time around as well - but the end of the merge window 
is when we have the least maintainer bandwidth as well ...

Anyway, I applied most of the patches (sans the rename), so the rename patch 
should be a lot simpler to execute at the right moment this time around.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/