Re: [PATCH v2,2/5] powerpc/rcpm: add RCPM driver
From: Scott Wood
Date: Wed Aug 26 2015 - 16:36:03 EST
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 08:09:45PM +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E
> +static void qoriq_disable_thread(int cpu)
> +{
> + int hw_cpu = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
> + int thread = cpu_thread_in_core(hw_cpu);
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_TENC, TEN_THREAD(thread));
> +}
> +#endif
This file is always used on book3e. If the intent is to only build this
on 64-bit, use CONFIG_PPC64 rather than relying on the fact that this one
of the confusing mess of BOOKE/BOOK3E symbols is 64-bit-only.
> +static void rcpm_v2_cpu_die(int cpu)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3E
> + int primary;
> +
> + if (threads_per_core == 2) {
> + primary = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
> + if (cpu_is_offline(primary) && cpu_is_offline(primary + 1)) {
> + /* if both threads are offline, put the cpu in PH20 */
> + rcpm_v2_cpu_enter_state(cpu, E500_PM_PH20);
> + } else {
> + /* if only one thread is offline, disable the thread */
> + qoriq_disable_thread(cpu);
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + if (threads_per_core == 1) {
> + rcpm_v2_cpu_enter_state(cpu, E500_PM_PH20);
> + return;
> + }
> +}
That "return;" adds nothing, and it's even more awkward having it on the
one-thread case but not the two-thread case.
> +static void rcpm_v1_cpu_up_prepare(int cpu)
> +{
> + rcpm_v1_cpu_exit_state(cpu, E500_PM_PH15);
> + rcpm_v1_irq_unmask(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static void rcpm_v2_cpu_exit_state(int cpu, int state)
> +{
> + int hw_cpu = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
> + u32 mask = 1 << cpu_core_index_of_thread(hw_cpu);
Are you sure cpu_core_index_of_thread() is supposed to take a hardware
cpu id? The only current user, pseries_energy.c, has the comment
"Convert logical cpu number to core number".
> +static const struct of_device_id rcpm_matches[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-1.0",
> + .data = (void *)&qoriq_rcpm_v1_ops,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-2.0",
> + .data = (void *)&qoriq_rcpm_v2_ops,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-2.1",
> + .data = (void *)&qoriq_rcpm_v2_ops,
> + },
> + {},
> +};
Unnecessary (and const-unsafe) casts.
> +
> +int __init fsl_rcpm_init(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, rcpm_matches, &match);
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_err("can't find the rcpm node.\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
It's not an error for the device tree node to not have this.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/