Re: [PATCH] arm: Handle starting up in secure mode

[Daniel Thompson]

On 24/08/15 14:55, Christopher Covington wrote:
> ARM Linux appears to have never been made aware of the ARMv7 security
> extensions. When CONFIG_ARM_SEC_EXT=y, have it probe for its security
> state by checking whether CNTFRQ is writeable and potentially make
> mode changes based on the information. The most features are available
> from hypervisor (HYP) mode, so switch to it possible. Failing that,
> prefer non-secure supervisor (SVC) mode to secure supervisor mode.

If there is no hypervisor mode available what benefit do we get from 
transitioning to non-secure mode?

When running in secure mode we retain access to some potentially useful 
features such as having access to FIQ.


Daniel.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/