Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties
From: Doug Anderson
Date: Thu Aug 27 2015 - 15:30:57 EST
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-)
One note: do you think it would make sense to re-implement shallow
suspend as "standby"? I had a proof of concept doing that in
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/275123/>. One nice
advantage is that you "magically" get a second set of regulator states
for standby vs "mem".
If I understand correctly, the distinction between "standby" and "mem"
is not too clearly defined, so if we wanted to use it for this it
wouldn't be terrible?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/