Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf,tools: store cpu->socket and cpu->core in perf_session_env

[Jiri Olsa]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:25:35AM -0400, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch parse cpu_topology from perf.data, and store cpu's socket id
> and core id information in perf_session_env.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

hum, I've made simple test to try this out (it's attached),
and got different results than what I see in the sysfs:

[root@ibm-x3650m4-01 cpu]# for i in `seq 0 23`; do core=`cat cpu$i/topology/core_id`; socket=`cat cpu$i/topology/physical_package_id`; echo "CPU $i, core $core, socket $socket"; done
CPU 0, core 0, socket 0
CPU 1, core 1, socket 0
CPU 2, core 2, socket 0
CPU 3, core 3, socket 0
CPU 4, core 4, socket 0
CPU 5, core 5, socket 0
CPU 6, core 0, socket 1
CPU 7, core 1, socket 1
CPU 8, core 2, socket 1
CPU 9, core 3, socket 1
CPU 10, core 4, socket 1
CPU 11, core 5, socket 1
CPU 12, core 0, socket 0
CPU 13, core 1, socket 0
CPU 14, core 2, socket 0
CPU 15, core 3, socket 0
CPU 16, core 4, socket 0
CPU 17, core 5, socket 0
CPU 18, core 0, socket 1
CPU 19, core 1, socket 1
CPU 20, core 2, socket 1
CPU 21, core 3, socket 1
CPU 22, core 4, socket 1
CPU 23, core 5, socket 1


[jolsa@ibm-x3650m4-01 perf]$ ./perf test topo
39: Test topology in session                                 :krava /tmp/perf-test-GOODG6
WARNING: The /tmp/perf-test-GOODG6 file's data size field is 0 which is unexpected.
Was the 'perf record' command properly terminated?
CPU 0, core 0, socket 0
CPU 1, core 1, socket 0
CPU 2, core 2, socket 0
CPU 3, core 3, socket 0
CPU 4, core 4, socket 0
CPU 5, core 5, socket 0
CPU 6, core 6, socket 1
CPU 7, core 7, socket 1
CPU 8, core 8, socket 1
CPU 9, core 9, socket 1
CPU 10, core 10, socket 1
CPU 11, core 11, socket 1
CPU 12, core 0, socket 0
CPU 13, core 1, socket 0
CPU 14, core 2, socket 0
CPU 15, core 3, socket 0
CPU 16, core 4, socket 0
CPU 17, core 5, socket 0
CPU 18, core 6, socket 1
CPU 19, core 7, socket 1
CPU 20, core 8, socket 1
CPU 21, core 9, socket 1
CPU 22, core 10, socket 1
CPU 23, core 11, socket 1
 Ok

the core id keeps on incrementing for the new socket which is wrong
also I think this patch should come with test like this

jirka


---
 tools/perf/tests/Build          |  1 +
 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c |  4 +++
 tools/perf/tests/tests.h        |  1 +
 tools/perf/tests/topology.c     | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/topology.c

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/Build b/tools/perf/tests/Build
index c1518bdd0f1b..208bbdf4d623 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/Build
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ perf-y += parse-no-sample-id-all.o
 perf-y += kmod-path.o
 perf-y += thread-map.o
 perf-y += llvm.o
+perf-y += topology.o
 
 perf-$(CONFIG_X86) += perf-time-to-tsc.o
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
index 136cd934be66..6650f2652739 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
@@ -179,6 +179,10 @@ static struct test {
 		.func = test__llvm,
 	},
 	{
+		.desc = "Test topology in session",
+		.func = test_session_topology,
+	},
+	{
 		.func = NULL,
 	},
 };
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
index bf113a247987..95654d7b5810 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ int test__fdarray__add(void);
 int test__kmod_path__parse(void);
 int test__thread_map(void);
 int test__llvm(void);
+int test_session_topology(void);
 
 #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
 #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2485dbe670da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include "tests.h"
+#include "util.h"
+#include "session.h"
+#include "evlist.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+
+#define TEMPL "/tmp/perf-test-XXXXXX"
+
+static int get_temp(char *path)
+{
+	int fd;
+
+	strcpy(path, TEMPL);
+
+	fd = mkstemp(path);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		perror("mkstemp failed");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	close(fd);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int test_session_topology(void)
+{
+	struct perf_session *session;
+	char path[PATH_MAX];
+	struct perf_data_file file = {
+		.path = path,
+		.mode = PERF_DATA_MODE_WRITE,
+	};
+	int i;
+
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("can't get templ file", !get_temp(path));
+
+	fprintf(stderr, "krava %s\n", path);
+
+	session = perf_session__new(&file, false, NULL);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("can't get session", session);
+
+	session->evlist = perf_evlist__new_default();
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("can't get evlist", session->evlist);
+
+	perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_CPU_TOPOLOGY);
+	perf_header__set_feat(&session->header, HEADER_NRCPUS);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to write header",
+			 !perf_session__write_header(session, session->evlist, file.fd, true));
+
+	perf_session__delete(session);
+
+	file.mode = PERF_DATA_MODE_READ;
+	session = perf_session__new(&file, false, NULL);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("can't get session", session);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < session->header.env.nr_cpus_online; i++) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "CPU %d, core %d, socket %d\n", i,
+			session->header.env.cpu[i].core_id,
+			session->header.env.cpu[i].socket_id);
+	}
+
+	perf_session__delete(session);
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/