[for-next][PATCH 03/14] ftrace: correct the counter increment for trace_buffer data

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Umesh Tiwari <umesh.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>

In ftrace_dump, for disabling buffer, iter.tr->trace_buffer.data is used.
But for enabling, iter.trace_buffer->data is used.
Even though, both point to same buffer, for readability, same convention
should be used.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434972306-20043-1-git-send-email-umesh.t@xxxxxxxxxxx

Signed-off-by: Umesh Tiwari <umesh.t@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 59814adc39d6..6e79408674aa 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6990,7 +6990,7 @@ void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode oops_dump_mode)
 	trace_init_global_iter(&iter);
 
 	for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
-		atomic_inc(&per_cpu_ptr(iter.tr->trace_buffer.data, cpu)->disabled);
+		atomic_inc(&per_cpu_ptr(iter.trace_buffer->data, cpu)->disabled);
 	}
 
 	old_userobj = trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_SYM_USEROBJ;
-- 
2.4.6


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/