Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Mon Aug 31 2015 - 13:09:35 EST

Next message: Sylvain Rochet: "[PATCH] regmap: fix NULL pointer dereference in __regmap_init if bus is NULL"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf script: enable printing of branch stack"
In reply to: Guenter Roeck: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)"
Next in thread: Marc Zyngier: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:40:43 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Marc,
>
> On 08/31/2015 09:18 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:47:07 -0700
> > Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Marc,
> >>
> >> On 08/31/2015 08:31 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:17:36 -0700
> >>> Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Guenter,
> >>>
> >>>> Qemu test results:
> >>>> total: 85 pass: 74 fail: 11
> >>>> Failed tests:
> >>>> arm:vexpress-a9:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> >>>> arm:vexpress-a15:arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> >>>> arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
> >>>> arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
> >>>> arm:realview-pb-a8:arm_realview_pb_defconfig
> >>>> arm:realview-eb:arm_realview_eb_defconfig
> >>>> mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
> >>>> xtensa:dc232b:lx60:xtensa_defconfig
> >>>> xtensa:dc232b:kc705:xtensa_defconfig
> >>>> xtensa:dc233c:ml605:generic_kc705_defconfig
> >>>> xtensa:dc233c:kc705:generic_kc705_defconfi
> >>>>
> >>>> Notable new failures (since next-20150828) are the s390 build failures,
> >>>> the arm64 build failure, and the arm qemu test failures.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>>> The qemu arm tests all fail silently, meaning there is no console
> >>>> output. Bisect points to 'irqchip/GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1'.
> >>>> Bisect log attached.
> >>>
> >>> Could you give me a qemu command-line I can use to track this down?
> >>> Real HW seems happy enough, from what I can see...
> >>>
> >>
> >> That is what I was most concerned about :-(. Unfortunately, it
> >> affects many of the most widely used arm qemu emulations, so it
> >> would be very desirable to get this fixed, either in the kernel
> >> or in qemu.
> >>
> >> See https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test, specifically
> >> https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/tree/master/rootfs/arm/.
> >> run-qemu-arm.sh includes the various command lines and configurations.
> >>
> >> Note that some of the tests require a patched version of qemu.
> >> The tests failing above should all work with the latest published
> >> version of qemu (2.4), though.
> >>
> >> Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help tracking
> >> this down.
> >
> > I give it a quick go with qemu 2.1.2 as installed on my laptop, and the
> > results are interesting:
> >
> > - With -next as of today, qemu segfaults. Humpffff.
> >
> > - If I use my branch that contains the EOImode==1 patch, the system
> > boots normally.
> >
> > So there is an interaction between this patch and whatever is in -next
> > at the moment, but that patch on its own is not what triggers the issue.
> >
> Looks like it.
>
> I did a couple of tests.
> - Revert 'irqchip/GIC: Don't deactivate interrupts forwarded to a guest'.
> Same problem.
> - Revert both 'irqchip/GIC: Don't deactivate interrupts forwarded to a guest'
> and 'irqchip/GIC: Convert to EOImode == 1'.
> Problem is no longer seen.

This is getting even more weird. I've upgraded my qemu to 2.3 (the
latest Debian seems to be carrying). I'm booting a A15-TC1 model with
the following:

emu-system-arm -machine vexpress-a15 -cpu cortex-a15 -m 512M
-kernel arch/arm/boot/zImage -append "console=ttyAMA0 earlyprintk"
-serial stdio -dtb arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dtb -display
none

The model dies with:

[...]
NET: Registered protocol family 16
DMA: preallocated 256 KiB pool for atomic coherent allocations
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000030
pgd = 80004000
[00000030] *pgd=00000000
Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.2.0-next-20150831+ #18
Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express
task: 9f458000 ti: 9f446000 task.ti: 9f446000
PC is at __regmap_init+0x15c/0xb18
LR is at 0x0
pc : [<802c3e50>] lr : [<00000000>] psr: 40000153
sp : 9f447d00 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000000
r10: 00000000 r9 : 00000001 r8 : 9f49f280
r7 : 00000000 r6 : 80697990 r5 : 80678034 r4 : 9f4ce400
r3 : 00000000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : 0000a4f4 r0 : 9f4ce400
Flags: nZcv IRQs on FIQs off Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment kernel
Control: 10c5387d Table: 8000406a DAC: 00000055
Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, stack limit = 0x9f446210)
Stack: (0x9f447d00 to 0x9f448000)
7d00: 806aa2b4 8059aa5c 9f4ce210 00000001 9f4ce210 00000000 9f4ce210 9f49a610
7d20: 9f49f280 88000b18 00000000 00000000 00000000 802cb6a0 00000000 00000000
7d40: 802663ec 00000001 00000000 00000000 9f49f210 fffffdfb 00000000 00000000
7d60: 9f49aa50 9f4ce210 9f49f250 fffffdfb 00000000 802664cc 9f4ce210 9f4ce200
7d80: 9f49f210 803a20bc 9f49be10 9f49bc30 9f4a0280 80597704 9f49be10 9f4ce210
7da0: 9f4ce210 806826d0 00000001 9f4ce210 9f4ce210 806826d0 fffffdfb 802b47f0
7dc0: 802b47ac 9f4ce210 806a805c 806826d0 00000001 802b2f80 00000000 9f447e08
7de0: 802b30e8 00000001 806a8038 802b1478 9f422970 9f49c0b8 9f4ce210 9f4ce210
7e00: 9f4ce244 802b2cb0 9f4ce210 00000001 9f4ce218 9f4ce218 9f4ce210 80677728
7e20: 00000000 802b23bc 9f4ce218 9f4ba000 9f4ce210 802b0784 00000000 00000001
7e40: 60000153 9f4ce200 9f4ce200 9f4ce210 00000000 9fbf02c4 00000000 9f4ba000
7e60: 00000000 80399190 00000000 9fbf0274 00000000 00000001 00000000 803992a8
7e80: 806a4e60 9f49f0c0 80631a84 00000000 000000a5 8064d83c 00000000 80397ca8
7ea0: 00000000 9f447ea8 00000002 9fbf0274 9fbf0174 00000000 00000000 9f4ba000
7ec0: 00000001 8064d83c 00000000 803995f4 00000001 000000a5 8064d83c 9fbf0174
7ee0: 806a4e60 9f49f0c0 80631a84 00000000 000000a5 80631b20 00000000 80666620
7f00: 80666620 80009770 8049a3ac 00000014 00000000 0000c000 cccccc00 801392ec
7f20: 00000000 8066924c 60000153 00000000 00000334 00000000 9fffce50 8003be10
7f40: 8056a05c 9fffce5b 00000002 00000002 80669234 00000000 8065b1c8 00000002
7f60: 8064d824 8068c000 8068c000 8064d83c 00000000 8061ae5c 00000002 00000002
7f80: 00000000 8061a598 00000000 80491d30 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
7fa0: 00000000 80491d38 00000000 8000f3e8 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
7fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
7fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 00000000 00000000
[<802c3e50>] (__regmap_init) from [<802cb6a0>] (vexpress_syscfg_regmap_init+0x11c/0x1d0)
[<802cb6a0>] (vexpress_syscfg_regmap_init) from [<802664cc>] (devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config+0x60/0xcc)
[<802664cc>] (devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config) from [<803a20bc>] (vexpress_osc_probe+0x30/0xf4)
[<803a20bc>] (vexpress_osc_probe) from [<802b47f0>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
[<802b47f0>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<802b2f80>] (driver_probe_device+0x24c/0x2f0)
[<802b2f80>] (driver_probe_device) from [<802b1478>] (bus_for_each_drv+0x64/0x98)
[<802b1478>] (bus_for_each_drv) from [<802b2cb0>] (__device_attach+0xa4/0x104)
[<802b2cb0>] (__device_attach) from [<802b23bc>] (bus_probe_device+0x84/0x8c)
[<802b23bc>] (bus_probe_device) from [<802b0784>] (device_add+0x3e4/0x56c)
[<802b0784>] (device_add) from [<80399190>] (of_platform_device_create_pdata+0x84/0xb8)
[<80399190>] (of_platform_device_create_pdata) from [<803992a8>] (of_platform_bus_create+0xd8/0x2f8)
[<803992a8>] (of_platform_bus_create) from [<803995f4>] (of_platform_populate+0x5c/0xac)
[<803995f4>] (of_platform_populate) from [<80631b20>] (vexpress_config_init+0x9c/0xc8)
[<80631b20>] (vexpress_config_init) from [<80009770>] (do_one_initcall+0x8c/0x1d4)
[<80009770>] (do_one_initcall) from [<8061ae5c>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x1d8/0x278)
[<8061ae5c>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<80491d38>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xe8)
[<80491d38>] (kernel_init) from [<8000f3e8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
Code: e2933000 13a03001 e5c43132 e30a14f4 (e5973030)
---[ end trace 5ab4f97e42f4e880 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b

---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b

And it dies the same way whether I have these GIC patches in or not.
Talk about consistency...

> There are several other patches in drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c since 4.2.
>
> 4c2880b31c70 irqchip/gic: Ensure gic_cpu_if_up/down() programs correct GIC instance
> 567e5a014848 irqchip/gic: Only allow the primary GIC to set the CPU map
> 4b979e4c611c Merge branch 'linus' into irq/core
> 0d3f2c92e004 irqchip/gic: Remove redundant gic_set_irqchip_flags
> aec89ef72ba6 irqchip/gic: Enable SKIP_SET_WAKE and MASK_ON_SUSPEND
> 5b29264c659c irqchip: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc
> 4d83fcf8d615 irqchip/gic: Consolidate chained IRQ handler install/remove
> 41a83e06e2bb irqchip: Prepare for local stub header removal
>
> Maybe there is an interaction between those and your patch ?
>

I had a quick look, and there is nothing I can immediately spot.

> > I need to build a more recent version of qemu, but the above doesn't
> > fill be with confidence...
> >
> My patched version of qemu 2.4 doesn't crash for me, it simply hangs.
> Not that this is much better.

So this seems to be specific to qemu 2.4 then. Time to build the sucker.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sylvain Rochet: "[PATCH] regmap: fix NULL pointer dereference in __regmap_init if bus is NULL"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf script: enable printing of branch stack"
In reply to: Guenter Roeck: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)"
Next in thread: Marc Zyngier: "Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 31 (new arm, arm64, s390 failures)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]