RE: [PATCH 1/1] perf,tools: open event on evsel cpus and threads
From: Liang, Kan
Date: Mon Aug 31 2015 - 17:06:47 EST
> Em Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 03:54:36PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:23:14AM -0400, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > evsel may have different cpus and threads as evlist's.
> > > Use it's own cpus and threads, when open evsel in perf record.
> >
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Applying, I wonder if this isn't affecting other tools as well... And also
No, it doesn't affect other tools.
> perf_evlist__open(), that has to be fixed as well, right?
>
Umm... Right.
We should fix it in perf_evlist__open as well.
IIRC, Jirka once planned to send out a cleanup patch separately for
this kind of issue (perf_evsel__enable also need to be fixed) on other
tools.
Thanks,
Kan
> - Arnaldo
>
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 2 +-
> > > tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 4 ++++
> > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > > b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c index 25cf6b4..a0178bf 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > > @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int record__open(struct record *rec)
> > >
> > > evlist__for_each(evlist, pos) {
> > > try_again:
> > > - if (perf_evsel__open(pos, evlist->cpus, evlist->threads) <
> 0) {
> > > + if (perf_evsel__open(pos, pos->cpus, pos->threads) < 0) {
> > > if (perf_evsel__fallback(pos, errno, msg,
> sizeof(msg))) {
> > > if (verbose)
> > > ui__warning("%s\n", msg);
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > index 373f65b..be6fde9 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > @@ -1179,6 +1179,10 @@ int perf_evlist__apply_filters(struct
> perf_evlist *evlist, struct perf_evsel **e
> > > if (evsel->filter == NULL)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * filters only work for tracepoint event, which doesn't
> have cpu limit.
> > > + * So evlist and evsel should always be same.
> > > + */
> > > err = perf_evsel__apply_filter(evsel, ncpus, nthreads,
> evsel->filter);
> > > if (err) {
> > > *err_evsel = evsel;
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> > >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/