Re: [PATCH v4 10/16] phy: Add driver for rockchip Display Port PHY
From: Yakir Yang
Date: Tue Sep 01 2015 - 21:05:01 EST
Hi Heiko,
å 09/02/2015 12:51 AM, Heiko Stuebner åé:
Am Dienstag, 1. September 2015, 14:04:15 schrieb Yakir Yang:
This phy driver would control the Rockchip DisplayPort module
phy clock and phy power, it is relate to analogix_dp-rockchip
dp driver. If you want DP works rightly on rockchip platform,
then you should select both of them.
Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v4:
- Take Kishon suggest, add commit message, and remove the redundant
rockchip_dp_phy_init() function, move those code to probe() method.
And remove driver .owner number.
Changes in v3:
- Take Heiko suggest, add rockchip dp phy driver,
collect the phy clocks and power control.
Changes in v2: None
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt | 26 ++++
drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 +
drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c | 166
+++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt create mode
100644 drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt new file mode
100644
index 0000000..5de1088
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Rockchip Soc Seroes Display Port PHY
+------------------------------------
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : should be one of the following supported values:
+ - "rockchip.rk3288-dp-phy"
+
+- reg : a list of registers used by phy driver
nodes do not necessarily need to have a regs property. You can do all
operations via the grf syscon already.
Oh, yes, the dp phy power register is belong to GRF filed, thanks.
+- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to dp clock.
+ of memory mapped region.
+- clock-names: from common clock binding:
+ Required elements: "sclk_dp" "sclk_dp_24m"
+
+- rockchip,grf: this soc should set GRF regs, so need get grf here.
+- #phy-cells : from the generic PHY bindings, must be 0;
+
+Example:
+
+edp_phy: phy@ff770274 {
edp_phy: edp-phy {
Done,
+ compatilble = "rockchip,rk3288-dp-phy";
+ reg = <0xff770274 4>;
no regs property
Done
+ rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
+ clocks = <&cru SCLK_EDP_24M>;
+ clock-names = "24m";
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
index 47da573..8f2bc4f 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
@@ -310,6 +310,13 @@ config PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB
help
Enable this to support the Rockchip USB 2.0 PHY.
+config PHY_ROCKCHIP_DP
+ tristate "Rockchip Display Port PHY Driver"
+ depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF
+ select GENERIC_PHY
+ help
+ Enable this to support the Rockchip Display Port PHY.
+
config PHY_ST_SPEAR1310_MIPHY
tristate "ST SPEAR1310-MIPHY driver"
select GENERIC_PHY
diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
index a5b18c1..e281f35 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) +=
phy-s5pv210-usb2.o obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_DP) += phy-rockchip-dp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_IPQ806X_SATA) += phy-qcom-ipq806x-sata.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ST_SPEAR1310_MIPHY) += phy-spear1310-miphy.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ST_SPEAR1340_MIPHY) += phy-spear1340-miphy.o
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e9a726e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/*
+ * Rockchip DP PHY driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 FuZhou Rockchip Co., Ltd.
+ * Author: Yakir Yang <ykk@@rock-chips.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
+#define GRF_SOC_CON12 0x0274
+#define GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER BIT(4)
+
+#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN BIT(21)
+#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_ON 0
+#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF BIT(5)
+
+struct rockchip_dp_phy {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct regmap *grf;
+ void __iomem *regs;
+ struct clk *phy_24m;
+};
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_clk_enable(struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = clk_set_rate(dp->phy_24m, 24000000);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dp->dev, "cannot set clock phy_24m %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(dp->phy_24m);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dp->dev, "cannot enable clock phy_24m %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_clk_disable(struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp)
+{
+ clk_disable_unprepare(dp->phy_24m);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_set_phy_state(struct phy *phy, bool enable)
+{
+ struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+
+ if (enable) {
+ rockchip_dp_phy_clk_enable(dp);
+ writel(DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN | DP_PHY_SIDDQ_ON, dp->regs);
+ } else {
+ rockchip_dp_phy_clk_disable(dp);
+ writel(DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN | DP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF, dp->regs);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ return rockchip_set_phy_state(phy, true);
+}
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ return rockchip_set_phy_state(phy, false);
+}
+
+static struct phy_ops rockchip_dp_phy_ops = {
static const struct ...
see 4a9e5ca1a54a ("phy: Constify struct phy_ops variables")
Done, thanks
+ .power_on = rockchip_dp_phy_power_on,
+ .power_off = rockchip_dp_phy_power_off,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int rockchip_dp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
+ struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp;
+ struct resource *res;
+ struct phy *phy;
+ int ret;
+
I guess this could profit from a
if (!np)
return -ENODEV;
Hmm... so we are avoiding the no of_device case,
Done,
+ dp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (IS_ERR(dp))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ dp->dev = dev;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ dp->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(dp->regs))
+ return PTR_ERR(dp->regs);
+
+ dp->phy_24m = devm_clk_get(dev, "24m");
+ if (IS_ERR(dp->phy_24m)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "cannot get clock 24m\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(dp->phy_24m);
+ }
+
+ dp->grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "rockchip,grf");
+ if (IS_ERR(dp->grf)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "rk3288-dp needs rockchip,grf property\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(dp->grf);
+ }
+
+ ret = regmap_write(dp->grf, GRF_SOC_CON12,
+ GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER |
+ (GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER << 16));
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ dev_err(dp->dev, "Could not config GRF edp ref clk: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ phy = devm(dev, NULL, &rockchip_dp_phy_ops, NULL);
hmm, where did you find 4 params for devm_phy_create? Shouldn't this be
phy = devm_phy_create(dev, np, &rockchip_dp_phy_ops);
instead - and also include the phy dt-node as 2nd parameter?
Oh, :-(=
I used to test the driver on chrome-3.14 branch, I always back the drm
head file,
so there would be no drm conflict. But phy driver is missed, the 4
params is come
from kernel-3.14.
Thanks for your redmind,
- Yakir
Heiko
+ if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to create phy\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(phy);
+ }
+ phy_set_drvdata(phy, dp);
+
+ phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
+
+ return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-dp-phy" },
+ {}
+};
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver rockchip_dp_phy_driver = {
+ .probe = rockchip_dp_phy_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "rockchip-dp-phy",
+ .of_match_table = rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids,
+ },
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(rockchip_dp_phy_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Rockchip DP PHY driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/