Re: [PATCH v4 10/16] phy: Add driver for rockchip Display Port PHY

From: Rob Herring
Date: Wed Sep 02 2015 - 09:27:50 EST


On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This phy driver would control the Rockchip DisplayPort module
> phy clock and phy power, it is relate to analogix_dp-rockchip
> dp driver. If you want DP works rightly on rockchip platform,
> then you should select both of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Take Kishon suggest, add commit message, and remove the redundant
> rockchip_dp_phy_init() function, move those code to probe() method.
> And remove driver .owner number.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Take Heiko suggest, add rockchip dp phy driver,
> collect the phy clocks and power control.
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt | 26 ++++

It is preferred that you split binding doc's from driver changes.

> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5de1088
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-dp-phy.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +Rockchip Soc Seroes Display Port PHY
> +------------------------------------
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : should be one of the following supported values:
> + - "rockchip.rk3288-dp-phy"
> +
> +- reg : a list of registers used by phy driver

Please state the size of the list and order of what each entry if more than one.

> +- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to dp clock.
> + of memory mapped region.
> +- clock-names: from common clock binding:
> + Required elements: "sclk_dp" "sclk_dp_24m"
> +
> +- rockchip,grf: this soc should set GRF regs, so need get grf here.

I have no idea what GRF means.

> +- #phy-cells : from the generic PHY bindings, must be 0;
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +edp_phy: phy@ff770274 {
> + compatilble = "rockchip,rk3288-dp-phy";
> + reg = <0xff770274 4>;
> + rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
> + clocks = <&cru SCLK_EDP_24M>;
> + clock-names = "24m";
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> index 47da573..8f2bc4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -310,6 +310,13 @@ config PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB
> help
> Enable this to support the Rockchip USB 2.0 PHY.
>
> +config PHY_ROCKCHIP_DP
> + tristate "Rockchip Display Port PHY Driver"
> + depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF
> + select GENERIC_PHY
> + help
> + Enable this to support the Rockchip Display Port PHY.
> +
> config PHY_ST_SPEAR1310_MIPHY
> tristate "ST SPEAR1310-MIPHY driver"
> select GENERIC_PHY
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> index a5b18c1..e281f35 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) += phy-s5pv210-usb2.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_DP) += phy-rockchip-dp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_IPQ806X_SATA) += phy-qcom-ipq806x-sata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ST_SPEAR1310_MIPHY) += phy-spear1310-miphy.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ST_SPEAR1340_MIPHY) += phy-spear1340-miphy.o
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e9a726e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-dp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
> +/*
> + * Rockchip DP PHY driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 FuZhou Rockchip Co., Ltd.
> + * Author: Yakir Yang <ykk@@rock-chips.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#define GRF_SOC_CON12 0x0274
> +#define GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER BIT(4)
> +
> +#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN BIT(21)
> +#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_ON 0
> +#define DP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF BIT(5)
> +
> +struct rockchip_dp_phy {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct regmap *grf;
> + void __iomem *regs;
> + struct clk *phy_24m;
> +};
> +
> +static int rockchip_dp_phy_clk_enable(struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(dp->phy_24m, 24000000);

Do you need to do this every time? This can go in probe.

> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dp->dev, "cannot set clock phy_24m %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(dp->phy_24m);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dp->dev, "cannot enable clock phy_24m %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_dp_phy_clk_disable(struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp)
> +{
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dp->phy_24m);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_set_phy_state(struct phy *phy, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + rockchip_dp_phy_clk_enable(dp);
> + writel(DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN | DP_PHY_SIDDQ_ON, dp->regs);
> + } else {
> + rockchip_dp_phy_clk_disable(dp);
> + writel(DP_PHY_SIDDQ_WRITE_EN | DP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF, dp->regs);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}

I would just inline all 3 of these functions. The wrappers don't
doesn't do anything, but add 2 levels of function calls.

> +
> +static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> + return rockchip_set_phy_state(phy, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> +{
> + return rockchip_set_phy_state(phy, false);
> +}
> +
> +static struct phy_ops rockchip_dp_phy_ops = {
> + .power_on = rockchip_dp_phy_power_on,
> + .power_off = rockchip_dp_phy_power_off,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static int rockchip_dp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> + struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct phy *phy;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (IS_ERR(dp))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + dp->dev = dev;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + dp->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(dp->regs))
> + return PTR_ERR(dp->regs);
> +
> + dp->phy_24m = devm_clk_get(dev, "24m");
> + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy_24m)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot get clock 24m\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(dp->phy_24m);
> + }

The binding says there are 2 clocks.

> +
> + dp->grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "rockchip,grf");
> + if (IS_ERR(dp->grf)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "rk3288-dp needs rockchip,grf property\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(dp->grf);
> + }
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(dp->grf, GRF_SOC_CON12,
> + GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER |
> + (GRF_EDP_REF_CLK_SEL_INTER << 16));
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + dev_err(dp->dev, "Could not config GRF edp ref clk: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &rockchip_dp_phy_ops, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to create phy\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(phy);
> + }
> + phy_set_drvdata(phy, dp);
> +
> + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
> +
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-dp-phy" },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rockchip_dp_phy_driver = {
> + .probe = rockchip_dp_phy_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "rockchip-dp-phy",
> + .of_match_table = rockchip_dp_phy_dt_ids,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(rockchip_dp_phy_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Rockchip DP PHY driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.1.2
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/