Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc
From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Mon Sep 07 2015 - 01:11:24 EST
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 17:51 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Hemant Kumar escreveu:
> > >Should I try to process the 5 together, applying thest two first?
> > Yes, this patchset needs to be applied before applying the other patchset,
> > since there is a direct dependency on these two for the tooling part to
> > work.
> > >I see there are no acks from powerpc arch maintainers, how should we
> > >proceed here? If there are no problems with the arch bits, and if it is
> > >just to enable the tooling part, again, should I process the 5 as just
> > >one series?
> > The reason to split the earlier patchset into two was to separate the
> > tooling/perf/ and arch/powerpc/ side patches, as asked by Michael..
> > Here is the link to that discussion :
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg86916.html
> > If Michael is ok with the patches, you can process all the 5 patches
> > together. Michael?
I'm not particularly happy with it.
Can we at least remove this hunk from the uapi header:
+/* This is to shut the compiler up */
+#define KVM_ENTRY_TRACE ""
+#define KVM_EXIT_TRACE ""
+#define KVM_EXIT_REASON ""
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/