Re: [PATCH 1/2] selinux: ioctl_has_perm should be static

From: Jeffrey Vander Stoep
Date: Mon Sep 28 2015 - 11:22:28 EST


Acked-by: Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fixes the following sparse warning:
>
> security/selinux/hooks.c:3242:5: warning: symbol 'ioctl_has_perm' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 84d21f9..5265c74 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -3239,7 +3239,7 @@ static void selinux_file_free_security(struct file *file)
> * Check whether a task has the ioctl permission and cmd
> * operation to an inode.
> */
> -int ioctl_has_perm(const struct cred *cred, struct file *file,
> +static int ioctl_has_perm(const struct cred *cred, struct file *file,
> u32 requested, u16 cmd)
> {
> struct common_audit_data ad;
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Selinux mailing list
> Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/