Re: [PATCH 1/2] selinux: ioctl_has_perm should be static

From: Stephen Smalley
Date: Tue Sep 29 2015 - 16:29:16 EST


On 09/27/2015 11:10 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
Fixes the following sparse warning:

security/selinux/hooks.c:3242:5: warning: symbol 'ioctl_has_perm' was
not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 84d21f9..5265c74 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -3239,7 +3239,7 @@ static void selinux_file_free_security(struct file *file)
* Check whether a task has the ioctl permission and cmd
* operation to an inode.
*/
-int ioctl_has_perm(const struct cred *cred, struct file *file,
+static int ioctl_has_perm(const struct cred *cred, struct file *file,
u32 requested, u16 cmd)
{
struct common_audit_data ad;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/