Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

[David Ahern]

On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
> This is one example with a team device:

for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/