Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

[Jan Blunck]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, David Ahern <dsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
>> This is one example with a team device:
>
>
> for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.
>

That is interesting. As far I can see you are setting IFF_SLAVE in
do_vrf_add_slave() and therefore already stop IPv6 addrconf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/