Re: [PATCH 3/3] lib/test-string_helpers.c: add string_get_size() tests

From: Rasmus Villemoes
Date: Mon Oct 26 2015 - 17:54:32 EST


On Mon, Oct 26 2015, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Add a couple of simple tests for string_get_size().
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/test-string_helpers.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test-string_helpers.c b/lib/test-string_helpers.c
> index 8e376ef..a158cb3 100644
> --- a/lib/test-string_helpers.c
> +++ b/lib/test-string_helpers.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,47 @@ out:
> kfree(out_test);
> }
>
> +#define string_get_size_maxbuf 16
> +#define test_string_get_size_one(size, blk_size, units, exp_result) \
> + do { \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(exp_result) >= string_get_size_maxbuf); \
> + __test_string_get_size((size), (blk_size), (units), \
> + (exp_result)); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +
> +static __init void __test_string_get_size(const u64 size, const u32 blk_size,
> + const enum string_size_units units,
> + const char *exp_result)
> +{
> + char buf[string_get_size_maxbuf];
> +
> + string_get_size(size, blk_size, units, buf, sizeof(buf));
> + if (!memcmp(buf, exp_result, strlen(exp_result) + 1))
> + return;
> +
> + buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = '\0';
> + pr_warn("Test 'test_string_get_size_one' failed!\n");
> + pr_warn("string_get_size(size = %llu, blk_size = %u, units = %d\n",
> + size, blk_size, units);
> + pr_warn("expected: '%s', got '%s'\n", exp_result, buf);
> +}
> +
> +static __init void test_string_get_size(void)
> +{
> + test_string_get_size_one(16384, 512, STRING_UNITS_2, "8.00 MiB");
> + test_string_get_size_one(500118192, 512, STRING_UNITS_2, "238 GiB");
> + test_string_get_size_one(8192, 4096, STRING_UNITS_10, "33.5 MB");
> + test_string_get_size_one(1100, 1, STRING_UNITS_10, "1.10 kB");
> + test_string_get_size_one(3000, 1900, STRING_UNITS_10, "5.70 MB");
> + test_string_get_size_one(151234561234657, 3456789, STRING_UNITS_10,
> + "522 EB");

Since we're changing this anyway, can't we test every pair of
(size,blk_size) with both units? That'll be twice the number of tests
for less horizontal real estate. E.g.

test_string_get_size_one(8192, 4096, "32.0 MiB", "33.5 MB");

Do we really care how and if string_get_size works for a non-power-of-2
blk_size? I certainly assume that we're passed a non-zero value.

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/