Re: kdbus refactoring?
From: Richard Weinberger
Date: Mon Nov 09 2015 - 03:15:51 EST
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:39:43PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:06:31PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> after reading on the removal of kdbus from Rawhide I've searched
>> >> the mailinglist archives for more details but didn't find anything.
>> >> So, what are your plans?
>> >>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2015-October/006011.html
>> > As that link said, based on the result of the code being in Rawhide, it
>> > is now being reworked / redesigned. The result will be posted for
>> > review "when it's ready".
>> If you rework/redesign something you have to know what you want to change.
>> That's why I was asking for the plan...
> Since when do people post "plans" or "design documents" on lkml without
> real code? Again, code will be posted when it's ready, like any other
> kernel submission.
Nobody asked for a design document.
And yes, people often say what they do or want to do.
Anyway, heise.de has details from the systemd.conf:
According to them the plan is making kdbus more universal and less
Which sounds great.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/