Re: kdbus refactoring?

From: Richard Weinberger
Date: Mon Nov 09 2015 - 03:15:51 EST

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:39:43PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:06:31PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> after reading on the removal of kdbus from Rawhide[1] I've searched
>> >> the mailinglist archives for more details but didn't find anything.
>> >> So, what are your plans?
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> >
>> > As that link said, based on the result of the code being in Rawhide, it
>> > is now being reworked / redesigned. The result will be posted for
>> > review "when it's ready".
>> If you rework/redesign something you have to know what you want to change.
>> That's why I was asking for the plan...
> Since when do people post "plans" or "design documents" on lkml without
> real code? Again, code will be posted when it's ready, like any other
> kernel submission.

Nobody asked for a design document.
And yes, people often say what they do or want to do.
Anyway, has details from the systemd.conf:

According to them the plan is making kdbus more universal and less
dbus specific.
Which sounds great.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at