Re: kdbus refactoring?

From: Richard Weinberger
Date: Mon Nov 09 2015 - 10:56:19 EST

Am 09.11.2015 um 16:02 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 09.11.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Herrmann:
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>>> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel
>>>>> way'.
>>>> This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was:
>>>> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100
>>>> Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation
>>> ..which was the last time we proposed it for inclusion.
>> Guys, let's cool down. :-)
>> What Peter is complaining about is that since the last proposal a lot
>> of iterative patches and even pull requests were sent instead of
>> complete patch series.
>> The expectation was that you send patch series with fixes folded in
>> as long the review takes.
> And that will happen, when the code is ready, nothing different is
> happening here from any other code submission. I don't know why people
> somehow think we don't know how to do this whole thing, it's as if they
> don't trust us, which is sad.

Well, what me makes sad is that my little question ended up in a flame.
If someone asks me how I plan to solve something I'm become proud and tell my ideas.
All I got was rejection and platitudes.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at