Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci: potentially bad behavior when using vmmc supply
From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Mon Nov 09 2015 - 08:28:19 EST
On 9 November 2015 at 14:14, Ludovic Desroches
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:50:50AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >> This doesn't seems like a case where a gpio regulator should be used
>> >> and I am not sure what problem it would solve. Beside to suppress the
>> >> log warnings (actually those aren't warnings but informations).
>> >> Isn't sdhci_do_start_signal_voltage_switch() doing what you need here?
>> > It is. I am only wondering the best way to describe the hardware:
>> > - No regulator but I have the 'no vqmmc regulator not found' message which
>> > is a bit annoying and which can be interpreted as an issue for someone
>> > who has no knowledge about this stuff.
>> Hmm, should we turn them into debug messages? Both regulators are optional.
> I think so. From my point of view, it is useless to indicate that
> something optionnal is missing.
Okay. Please go ahead and send a patch.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/