Re: [PATCH 4/4] locking: Introduce smp_cond_acquire()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Nov 11 2015 - 07:12:42 EST
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:39:40PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Just be curious, should spin_unlock_wait() semantically be an ACQUIRE?
I did wonder the same thing, it would simplify a number of things if
this were so.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/