Re: kernel oops on mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20

From: Minchan Kim
Date: Wed Nov 11 2015 - 19:36:04 EST

Next message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar_thermal: use pm_runtime_put_sync()"
Previous message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] Documentation: dt-bindings: Describe SROMc configuration"
In reply to: Kirill A. Shutemov: "Re: kernel oops on mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20"
Next in thread: Minchan Kim: "Re: kernel oops on mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:55:22AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09:19:22AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:20:19AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 04:33:29PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:16:50AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:02:58PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello Kirill,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:57:49PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 04:03:50PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:52:06AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 04:58:29PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:25:24AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 06:00:51PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:21:36AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Hugh,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:59:59PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I added the code to check it and queued it again but I had another oops
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this time but symptom is related to anon_vma, too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (kernel is based on recent mmotm + unconditional mkdirty for bug fix)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems page_get_anon_vma returns NULL since the page was not page_mapped
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at that time but second check of page_mapped right before try_to_unmap seems
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page:ffffea0001cfbfc0 count:3 mapcount:1 mapping:ffff88007f1b5f51 index:0x600000aff
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flags: 0x4000000000048019(locked|uptodate|dirty|swapcache|swapbacked)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageAnon(page) && !PageKsm(page) && !anon_vma)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's interesting, that's one I added in my page migration series.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me think on it, but it could well relate to the one you got before.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will roll back to mm/madv_free-v4.3-rc5-mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > instead of next-20151021 to remove noise from your migration cleanup
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > series and will test it again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If it is fixed, I will test again with your migration patchset, then.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I tested mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20 with test program I attach for a long time.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore, there is no patchset from Hugh's migration patch in there.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > And I added below debug code with request from Kirill to all test kernels.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It took too long time (and a lot of printk()), but I think I track it down
> > > > > > > > > > > > finally.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The patch below seems fixes issue for me. It's not yet properly tested, but
> > > > > > > > > > > > looks like it works.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The problem was my wrong assumption on how migration works: I thought that
> > > > > > > > > > > > kernel would wait migration to finish on before deconstruction mapping.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > But turn out that's not true.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > As result if zap_pte_range() races with split_huge_page(), we can end up
> > > > > > > > > > > > with page which is not mapped anymore but has _count and _mapcount
> > > > > > > > > > > > elevated. The page is on LRU too. So it's still reachable by vmscan and by
> > > > > > > > > > > > pfn scanners (Sasha showed few similar traces from compaction too).
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's likely that page->mapping in this case would point to freed anon_vma.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > BOOM!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The patch modify freeze/unfreeze_page() code to match normal migration
> > > > > > > > > > > > entries logic: on setup we remove page from rmap and drop pin, on removing
> > > > > > > > > > > > we get pin back and put page on rmap. This way even if migration entry
> > > > > > > > > > > > will be removed under us we don't corrupt page's state.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please, test.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > kernel: On mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20 + pte_mkdirty patch + your new patch, I tested
> > > > > > > > > > > one I sent to you(ie, oops.c + memcg_test.sh)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > page:ffffea00016a0000 count:3 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88007f49d001 index:0x600001800 compound_mapcount: 0
> > > > > > > > > > > flags: 0x4000000000044009(locked|uptodate|head|swapbacked)
> > > > > > > > > > > page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_mapcount(page))
> > > > > > > > > > > page->mem_cgroup:ffff88007f613c00
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Ignore my previous answer. Still sleeping.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The right way to fix I think is something like:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > > > > > > > > > index 35643176bc15..f2d46792a554 100644
> > > > > > > > > > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > > > > > > > > > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > > > > > > > > > @@ -1173,20 +1173,12 @@ void do_page_add_anon_rmap(struct page *page,
> > > > > > > > > > bool compound = flags & RMAP_COMPOUND;
> > > > > > > > > > bool first;
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > - if (PageTransCompound(page)) {
> > > > > > > > > > + if (PageTransCompound(page) && compound) {
> > > > > > > > > > + atomic_t *mapcount;
> > > > > > > > > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
> > > > > > > > > > - if (compound) {
> > > > > > > > > > - atomic_t *mapcount;
> > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageTransHuge(page), page);
> > > > > > > > > > - mapcount = compound_mapcount_ptr(page);
> > > > > > > > > > - first = atomic_inc_and_test(mapcount);
> > > > > > > > > > - } else {
> > > > > > > > > > - /* Anon THP always mapped first with PMD */
> > > > > > > > > > - first = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!page_mapcount(page), page);
> > > > > > > > > > - atomic_inc(&page->_mapcount);
> > > > > > > > > > - }
> > > > > > > > > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageTransHuge(page), page);
> > > > > > > > > > + mapcount = compound_mapcount_ptr(page);
> > > > > > > > > > + first = atomic_inc_and_test(mapcount);
> > > > > > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > > > > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound, page);
> > > > > > > > > > first = atomic_inc_and_test(&page->_mapcount);
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > kernel: On mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20 + pte_mkdirty patch + freeze/unfreeze patch + above patch,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff880058d2e580 idx:1 val:512
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > <SNIP>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > > > > > > BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff880046980700 idx:1 val:511
> > > > > > > > > BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff880046980700 idx:2 val:1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hm. I was not able to trigger this and don't see anything obviuous what can
> > > > > > > > lead to this kind of missmatch :-/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I managed to trigger this when switched back from MADV_DONTNEED to
> > > > > > MADV_FREE. Hm..
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm,,
> > > > > What version of MADV_FREE do you test on?
> > > > > Old MADV_FREE(ie, before posting MADV_FREE refactoring and fix KSM page)
> > > > > had a bug.
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried your patches on top of recent my MADV_FREE patches.
> > > > > But when I try it with old THP refcount redesign, I couldn't find
> > > > > any problem so far. However, I'm not saying it's your fault.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will give it a shot with MADV_DONTNEED to reproduce the problem.
> > > > > But one thing I could say is MADV_DONTNEED is more hard to hit
> > > > > compared to MADV_FREE because memory pressure of MADV_DONTNEED test
> > > > > wouldn't be heavy.
> > > >
> > > > I reproduced this on the kernel which has no code related to MADV_FREE:
> > > >
> > > > mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20-no-madvise_free, IOW it means git head for
> > > > 54bad5da4834 arm64: add pmd_[dirty|mkclean] for THP so there is no
> > > > MADV_FREE code in there
> > > > + pte_mkdirty patch
> > > > + freeze/unfreeze patch
> > > > + do_page_add_anon_rmap patch
> > > >
> > > > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > > > BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff88007fdd5b00 idx:1 val:511
> > > > BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff88007fdd5b00 idx:2 val:1
> > >
> > > I have one idea why it could happen, but not sure yet..
> > >
> > > Could you check if it makes any difference for you?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > > index 5c7b00e88236..194f7f8b8c66 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > > @@ -103,12 +103,7 @@ void deferred_split_huge_page(struct page *page);
> > > void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> > > unsigned long address);
> > >
> > > -#define split_huge_pmd(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
> > > - do { \
> > > - pmd_t *____pmd = (__pmd); \
> > > - if (pmd_trans_huge(*____pmd)) \
> > > - __split_huge_pmd(__vma, __pmd, __address); \
> > > - } while (0)
> > > +#define split_huge_pmd(__vma, __pmd, __address) __split_huge_pmd(__vma, __pmd, __address)
> >
> > mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20-no-madvise_free, IOW it means git head for
> > 54bad5da4834 arm64: add pmd_[dirty|mkclean] for THP so there is no
> > MADV_FREE code in there
> > + pte_mkdirty patch
> > + freeze/unfreeze patch
> > + do_page_add_anon_rmap patch
> > + above split_huge_pmd
> >
> >
> > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > Adding 4191228k swap on /dev/vda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4191228k FS
> > BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff88007fa3bb80 idx:1 val:512
>
> With the patch below my test setup run for 2+ days without triggering the
> bug. split_huge_pmd patch should be dropped.
>
> Please test.
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 14cbbad54a3e..7aa0a3fef2aa 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2841,9 +2841,6 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> write = pmd_write(*pmd);
> young = pmd_young(*pmd);
>
> - /* leave pmd empty until pte is filled */
> - pmdp_huge_clear_flush_notify(vma, haddr, pmd);
> -
> pgtable = pgtable_trans_huge_withdraw(mm, pmd);
> pmd_populate(mm, &_pmd, pgtable);
>
> @@ -2893,6 +2890,28 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> }
>
> smp_wmb(); /* make pte visible before pmd */
> + /*
> + * Up to this point the pmd is present and huge and userland has the
> + * whole access to the hugepage during the split (which happens in
> + * place). If we overwrite the pmd with the not-huge version pointing
> + * to the pte here (which of course we could if all CPUs were bug
> + * free), userland could trigger a small page size TLB miss on the
> + * small sized TLB while the hugepage TLB entry is still established in
> + * the huge TLB. Some CPU doesn't like that.
> + * See http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/41322.pdf, Erratum
> + * 383 on page 93. Intel should be safe but is also warns that it's
> + * only safe if the permission and cache attributes of the two entries
> + * loaded in the two TLB is identical (which should be the case here).
> + * But it is generally safer to never allow small and huge TLB entries
> + * for the same virtual address to be loaded simultaneously. So instead
> + * of doing "pmd_populate(); flush_pmd_tlb_range();" we first mark the
> + * current pmd notpresent (atomically because here the pmd_trans_huge
> + * and pmd_trans_splitting must remain set at all times on the pmd
> + * until the split is complete for this pmd), then we flush the SMP TLB
> + * and finally we write the non-huge version of the pmd entry with
> + * pmd_populate.
> + */
> + pmdp_invalidate(vma, haddr, pmd);
> pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>
> if (freeze) {

I have been tested this patch with MADV_DONTNEED for a few days and
I couldn't see the problem any more. And I will continue to test it
with MADV_FREE.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rafael J. Wysocki: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar_thermal: use pm_runtime_put_sync()"
Previous message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] Documentation: dt-bindings: Describe SROMc configuration"
In reply to: Kirill A. Shutemov: "Re: kernel oops on mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20"
Next in thread: Minchan Kim: "Re: kernel oops on mmotm-2015-10-15-15-20"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]