Re: [PATCH] acpi: add support for extended IRQ to PCI link

[okaya]

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 11/12/2015 4:56 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>> -       if (acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) {
>>>> +       if ((acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) && (irq <
>>>> ACPI_MAX_IRQS)) {
>>>>                 /*
>>>
>>>> -                * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to
>>>> promote
>>>> -                * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
>>>> +                * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to
>>>> +                * promote the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
>>>
>>> What was changed here?
>>
>> See your comments here.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/231
>
> So, you refer to narrow commentary blocks, right?
> It was about *new* code, leave as is what was before your patch series.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>

This is what it was before.

>         if (acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) {
> -               /*
> -                * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to promote
> -                * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
> -                */
> -               for (i = (link->irq.possible_count - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
> -                       if (acpi_irq_penalty[irq] >
> -                           acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.possible[i]])
> -                               irq = link->irq.possible[i];

I added a range check for link->irq.possible[i] and irq into this code.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/