Re: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: Introduce dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason()

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Nov 18 2015 - 10:52:24 EST

On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a
> > plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY.
> Other way around.

Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call
dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid
on a MEMCPY channel.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at