Re: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: Introduce dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason()
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Nov 18 2015 - 11:00:50 EST
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a
>> > plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY.
>> Other way around.
> Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call
> dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid
> on a MEMCPY channel.
Hmmâ That's right, though I suspect still one thing why it's done this
way. Let's ask Vinod and Liam about that.
With Best Regards,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/