Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: berlin: add the pinctrl dependency for Marvell Berlin SoCs

[Sebastian Hesselbarth]

On 19.11.2015 17:59, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:41:54 +0000
> Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:36:10PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>>> This is to add the pinctrl dependency for Marvell Berlin SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  this small patch is missed:
>>>  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/378638.html
>>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> index 4043c35..905d308 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARCH_BERLIN
>>>  	bool "Marvell Berlin SoC Family"
>>>  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>>>  	select DW_APB_ICTL
>>> +	select PINCTRL
>>>  	help
>>>  	  This enables support for Marvell Berlin SoC Family  
>>
>> Cc'ing arm-soc.
>>
> 
> when adding clk support for BG4CT, I found
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/378634.html
> and
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/378635.html
> 
> are also missed in v4.4-rc1.
> 
> I know you are very busy but I dunno what's wrong. Can you please check?

Jisheng,

there is nothing wrong. I applied the patches in question but didn't
make it to send another pull-request in time.

I have re-added both patches to berlin64/dt again that will be sent
for v4.4.

Sebastian


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/