Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: use list_{first,next}_entry

[Michal Hocko]

On Thu 03-12-15 22:16:55, Geliang Tang wrote:
> To make the intention clearer, use list_{first,next}_entry instead
> of list_entry.

Does this really help readability? This function simply uncharges the
given list of pages. Why cannot we simply use list_for_each_entry
instead...

> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 79a29d5..a6301ea 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5395,16 +5395,12 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
>  	unsigned long nr_file = 0;
>  	unsigned long nr_huge = 0;
>  	unsigned long pgpgout = 0;
> -	struct list_head *next;
>  	struct page *page;
>  
> -	next = page_list->next;
> +	page = list_first_entry(page_list, struct page, lru);
>  	do {
>  		unsigned int nr_pages = 1;
>  
> -		page = list_entry(next, struct page, lru);
> -		next = page->lru.next;
> -
>  		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
>  		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page), page);
>  
> @@ -5440,7 +5436,8 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
>  		page->mem_cgroup = NULL;
>  
>  		pgpgout++;
> -	} while (next != page_list);
> +	} while (!list_is_last(&page->lru, page_list) &&
> +		 (page = list_next_entry(page, lru)));
>  
>  	if (memcg)
>  		uncharge_batch(memcg, pgpgout, nr_anon, nr_file,
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/