RE: [PATCH 3/9] ACPI: add struct acpi_amba_quirk for AMD pl330 specific device config
From: Wang, Annie
Date: Fri Dec 11 2015 - 01:58:05 EST
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Graeme Gregory [mailto:gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 9:16 PM
>To: Wang, Annie
>Cc: Vinod Koul; Mika Westerberg; Joerg Roedel; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Rafael J.
>Wysocki; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>foundation.org; Borislav Petkov; Huang, Ray; Wan, Vincent; Xue, Ken; Li, Tony
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] ACPI: add struct acpi_amba_quirk for AMD pl330
>specific device config
>
>On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:24:20AM +0800, Wang Hongcheng wrote:
>> AMD pl330 is a UART DMA device, it shares one ACPI item with UART. So
>> a platform device and an acpi device will be created according to
>> AMD0020 ACPI dev. And its mem base address must have an offset. As a
>> result, MULTI_ATTACHED_QUIRK and MULTI_ATTACHED_QUIRK are used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hongcheng <annie.wang@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>-----
>> include/linux/acpi.h | 13 +++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c index
>> 4f0366a..8a5269c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("amba");
>> * @periphid: AMBA device periphid.
>> * @fixed_rate: Clock frequency.
>> * @pdata: Platform data specific to the device.
>> + * @quirk: Specific device config, including device multiattach.
>> + * and mem base offset.
>> *
>> * Check if the given @adev can be represented as an AMBA device and, if
>> * that's the case, create and register an AMBA device, populate its
>> @@ -42,7 +44,8 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("amba"); struct amba_device
>> *acpi_create_amba_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
>> unsigned int periphid,
>> unsigned long fixed_rate,
>> - void *pdata)
>> + void *pdata,
>> + struct acpi_amba_quirk *quirk)
>> {
>> struct amba_device *amba_dev = NULL;
>> struct device *parent;
>> @@ -54,12 +57,14 @@ struct amba_device *acpi_create_amba_device(struct
>acpi_device *adev,
>> unsigned int i;
>> unsigned int irq[AMBA_NR_IRQS];
>> struct clk *clk = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + char amba_devname[100];
>>
>> /*
>> * If the ACPI node already has a physical device attached,
>> - * skip it.
>> + * skip it. Except some special devices such as AMD0020 which
>> + * needs attach physical devices two times.
>> */
>> - if (adev->physical_node_count)
>> + if (adev->physical_node_count && !(quirk->quirk &
>> +MULTI_ATTACHED_QUIRK))
>> return NULL;
>>
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
>> @@ -85,7 +90,24 @@ struct amba_device *acpi_create_amba_device(struct
>acpi_device *adev,
>> memcpy(resource, rentry->res, sizeof(struct resource));
>> }
>>
>> - amba_dev = amba_device_alloc(dev_name(&adev->dev),
>> + /*
>> + * The memory address of AMD pl330 has an offset of ACPI
>> + * mem resource.
>> + */
>> + if (quirk->quirk & BASE_OFFSET_QUIRK)
>> + resource->start += quirk->base_offset;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the ACPI device already has a node attached. It must be
>> + * renamed.
>> + */
>> + if (quirk->quirk & MULTI_ATTACHED_QUIRK)
>> + sprintf(amba_devname, "%s%s", dev_name(&adev->dev),
>"DMA");
>> + else
>> + memcpy(amba_devname, dev_name(&adev->dev),
>> + strlen(dev_name(&adev->dev)));
>> +
>> + amba_dev = amba_device_alloc(amba_devname,
>> resource->start,
>> resource_size(resource));
>>
>
>Isn't this basially an MFD in a rather odd fashion?
>
>I would have though having a device which just splits the resources then creates 2
>children would be a whole lot simpler?
>
>Graeme
It seems more complex, if I trans an ACPI device to pdev, then attach 2 platform child nodes,
and create an amba device refer to one of the childs. Too many trans.
Thanks,
Hongcheng(Annie)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/