Re: [PATCH/RFC 03/16] perf top: Factor out warnings about kernel addresses and symbols

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Sun Dec 13 2015 - 21:03:24 EST


On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:07:48PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 04:53:22PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> > Factor out warning messages into separate functions. These will be
>> > called in the display thread later.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> Without applying patch 2, will check if it happens without this patch as well
>>
>>
>>
>> [root@ssdandy ~]# echo 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
>> [root@ssdandy ~]# perf top
>> perf: Segmentation fault
>> -------- backtrace --------
>> perf[0x538b3b]
>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x35650)[0x7f401c036650]
>> perf[0x43af66]
>> perf(cmd_top+0xedf)[0x43cdbf]
>> perf[0x47b7c3]
>> perf(main+0x617)[0x4222b7]
>> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f401c022af5]
>> perf[0x4223c9]
>> [0x0]
>> [root@ssdandy ~]#
>
> This patch changed the order in the condition, so if kptr_restrict is
> on, kernel map is NULL and checking al->map->dso caused the segfault.

Oh, it's not this patch. This patch just move the condition as is but
I did the change in the patch 5/16. Will fix there.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/