RE: [PATCH 0/7][v4] Add OTG support for FSL socs

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx]
>> Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 3:04 AM
>> To: Mehresh Ramneek-B31383 <ramneek.mehresh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>> usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mehresh Ramneek-B31383
>> <ramneek.mehresh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v4] Add OTG support for FSL socs
>> 
>> Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> Add support for otg for all freescale socs having internal usb phy.
>> >>
>> >> Ramneek Mehresh (7):
>> >>   usb:fsl:otg: Make fsl otg driver as tristate
>> >>   usb:fsl:otg: Add controller version based ULPI and UTMI phy
>> >>   usb:fsl:otg: Add support to add/remove usb host driver
>> >>   usb:fsl:otg: Signal host drv when host is otg
>> >>   usb:fsl:otg: Modify otg_event to start host drv
>> >>   usb:fsl:otg: Combine host/gadget start/resume for ID change
>> >>   usb:fsl:otg: Add host-gadget drv sync delay
>> >
>> > Unless Alan's okay with the host side changes, I can't accept any of
>> > these. However, I must say some of the flags you add here already
>> > exist in some way, shape or form. For example, look at is_b_host flag.
>>
>
> Could you please be more specific...which flag you think that I should
>remove/I'm re-defining. The flags I'm defining are:
>
> have_hcd : defined in fsl specific structure for fsl specific use-case
>
> had_hcd: defined in fsl specific structure for fsl specific use-case
>
> is_otg : defined in include/linux/usb.h
>
> Are you suggesting using otg_port or is_b_host instead of is_otg?
>
> As I understand, is_b_host is specifically to check if an otg B device
> is in host mode...correct?  I just need a flag to check if a
> controller is capable of otg operations? That's why defined "is_otg"
> flag. Please suggest.

no, I don't know why I made that comment. You could use otg_port, but
that wouldn't look very clean. Can you resend with Alan's ack, then I'll
move this series into testing/next.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature