Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Simplify core code related to boost support

[Viresh Kumar]

On 27-12-15, 00:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Notice that the boost_supported field in struct cpufreq_driver is
> redundant, because the driver's ->set_boost callback may be left
> unset if "boost" is not supported.  Moreover, the only driver
> populating the ->set_boost callback is acpi_cpufreq, so make it
> avoid populating that callback if "boost" is not supported, rework
> the core to check ->set_boost instead of boost_supported to
> verify "boost" support and drop boost_supported which isn't
> used any more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c |    5 ++---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c      |   22 +++++++---------------
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h        |    1 -
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/