Hi Elaine,
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016, 08:05:44 schrieb zhangqing:
This driver is modified to support RK3368 SoC.
Signed-off-by: zhangqing <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 33
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
| 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c index 534c589..6cdffb1 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
#include <dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h>
struct rockchip_domain_info {
int pwr_mask;
@@ -75,6 +76,9 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
#define DOMAIN_RK3288(pwr, status, req) \
DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, req, (req) + 16)
+#define DOMAIN_RK3368(pwr, status, req) \
+ DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, (req) + 16, req)
+
static bool rockchip_pmu_domain_is_idle(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd)
{
struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
@@ -444,6 +448,14 @@ static const struct rockchip_domain_info
rk3288_pm_domains[] = { [RK3288_PD_GPU] = DOMAIN_RK3288(9, 9, 2),
};
+static const struct rockchip_domain_info rk3368_pm_domains[] = {
+ [RK3368_PD_PERI] = DOMAIN_RK3368(13, 12, 6),
+ [RK3368_PD_VIO] = DOMAIN_RK3368(15, 14, 8),
+ [RK3368_PD_VIDEO] = DOMAIN_RK3368(14, 13, 7),
+ [RK3368_PD_GPU_0] = DOMAIN_RK3368(16, 15, 2),
+ [RK3368_PD_GPU_1] = DOMAIN_RK3368(17, 16, 2),
+};
The structure in the registers (and thus the macros you define above) is the
same between rk3288 and rk3368, so there is no need to define that a second
time. It is perfectly fine to re-use the DOMAIN_RK3288 macro here and saves
double-definitions. [see our clock-drivers which already do this for the
common parts].
+
static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3288_pmu = {
.pwr_offset = 0x08,
.status_offset = 0x0c,
@@ -461,11 +473,32 @@ static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3288_pmu = {
.domain_info = rk3288_pm_domains,
};
+static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3368_pmu = {
+ .pwr_offset = 0x0c,
+ .status_offset = 0x10,
+ .req_offset = 0x3c,
+ .idle_offset = 0x40,
+ .ack_offset = 0x40,
+
+ .core_pwrcnt_offset = 0x48,
+ .gpu_pwrcnt_offset = 0x50,
+
+ .core_power_transition_time = 24,
+ .gpu_power_transition_time = 24,
+
+ .num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3368_pm_domains),
+ .domain_info = rk3368_pm_domains,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[] = {
{
.compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller",
.data = (void *)&rk3288_pmu,
},
+ {
+ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3368-power-controller",
+ .data = (void *)&rk3368_pmu,
+ },
{ /* sentinel */ },
};
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h new file mode 100644
index 0000000..93633d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
Please split the addition of the binding-header into a separate patch. We
will need the header in both the soc-specific code as well as the devicetree
side, which requires the header being in a shared branch.
Otherwise patch looks great.
Thanks
Heiko
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3368_POWER_H__
+#define __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3368_POWER_H__
+
+/* VD_CORE */
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_L0 0
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_L1 1
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_L2 2
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_L3 3
+#define RK3368_PD_SCU_L 4
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_B0 5
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_B1 6
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_B2 7
+#define RK3368_PD_A53_B3 8
+#define RK3368_PD_SCU_B 9
+
+/* VD_LOGIC */
+#define RK3368_PD_BUS 10
+#define RK3368_PD_PERI 11
+#define RK3368_PD_VIO 12
+#define RK3368_PD_ALIVE 13
+#define RK3368_PD_VIDEO 14
+#define RK3368_PD_GPU_0 15
+#define RK3368_PD_GPU_1 16
+
+/* VD_PMU */
+#define RK3368_PD_PMU 17
+
+#endif