Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Modify power domain driver for rk3368

[Heiko Stuebner]

Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016, 09:08:14 schrieb zhangqing:
> On 01/08/2016 12:25 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Hi Elaine,
> > 
> > Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016, 08:05:44 schrieb zhangqing:
> >> This driver is modified to support RK3368 SoC.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: zhangqing <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>   drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c        | 33
> >> 
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
> >> 
> >> | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
> >> | 
> >>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> >> b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c index 534c589..6cdffb1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> >> 
> >>   #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >>   #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >>   #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h>
> >> 
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h>
> >> 
> >>   struct rockchip_domain_info {
> >>   
> >>   	int pwr_mask;
> >> 
> >> @@ -75,6 +76,9 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
> >> 
> >>   #define DOMAIN_RK3288(pwr, status, req)		\
> >>   
> >>   	DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, req, (req) + 16)
> >> 
> >> +#define DOMAIN_RK3368(pwr, status, req)		\
> >> +	DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, (req) + 16, req)
> >> +
> >> 
> >>   static bool rockchip_pmu_domain_is_idle(struct rockchip_pm_domain
> >>   *pd)
> >>   {
> >>   
> >>   	struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
> >> 
> >> @@ -444,6 +448,14 @@ static const struct rockchip_domain_info
> >> rk3288_pm_domains[] = { [RK3288_PD_GPU]		= DOMAIN_RK3288(9, 9, 2),
> >> 
> >>   };
> >> 
> >> +static const struct rockchip_domain_info rk3368_pm_domains[] = {
> >> +	[RK3368_PD_PERI]	= DOMAIN_RK3368(13, 12, 6),
> >> +	[RK3368_PD_VIO]		= DOMAIN_RK3368(15, 14, 8),
> >> +	[RK3368_PD_VIDEO]	= DOMAIN_RK3368(14, 13, 7),
> >> +	[RK3368_PD_GPU_0]	= DOMAIN_RK3368(16, 15, 2),
> >> +	[RK3368_PD_GPU_1]	= DOMAIN_RK3368(17, 16, 2),
> >> +};
> > 
> > The structure in the registers (and thus the macros you define above) is
> > the same between rk3288 and rk3368, so there is no need to define that
> > a second time. It is perfectly fine to re-use the DOMAIN_RK3288 macro
> > here and saves double-definitions. [see our clock-drivers which already
> > do this for the common parts].
> 
> The ack_mask bit and idle_mask bit is different in rk3368.
> you can check the :
> 
> +#define DOMAIN_RK3368(pwr, status, req)		\
> +	DOMAIN(pwr, status, req,(req) + 16, req)
> +
> But the rk3288 is :
> #define DOMAIN_RK3288(pwr, status, req)		\
>   	DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, req, (req) + 16)

ah sorry, misread that then ... so please forget I said anything ;-)


Heiko

> 
> >> +
> >> 
> >>   static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3288_pmu = {
> >>   
> >>   	.pwr_offset = 0x08,
> >>   	.status_offset = 0x0c,
> >> 
> >> @@ -461,11 +473,32 @@ static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3288_pmu
> >> = { .domain_info = rk3288_pm_domains,
> >> 
> >>   };
> >> 
> >> +static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3368_pmu = {
> >> +	.pwr_offset = 0x0c,
> >> +	.status_offset = 0x10,
> >> +	.req_offset = 0x3c,
> >> +	.idle_offset = 0x40,
> >> +	.ack_offset = 0x40,
> >> +
> >> +	.core_pwrcnt_offset = 0x48,
> >> +	.gpu_pwrcnt_offset = 0x50,
> >> +
> >> +	.core_power_transition_time = 24,
> >> +	.gpu_power_transition_time = 24,
> >> +
> >> +	.num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3368_pm_domains),
> >> +	.domain_info = rk3368_pm_domains,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> 
> >>   static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[] = {
> >>   
> >>   	{
> >>   	
> >>   		.compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-power-controller",
> >>   		.data = (void *)&rk3288_pmu,
> >>   	
> >>   	},
> >> 
> >> +	{
> >> +		.compatible = "rockchip,rk3368-power-controller",
> >> +		.data = (void *)&rk3368_pmu,
> >> +	},
> >> 
> >>   	{ /* sentinel */ },
> >>   
> >>   };
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
> >> b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..93633d5
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
> > 
> > Please split the addition of the binding-header into a separate patch.
> > We
> > will need the header in both the soc-specific code as well as the
> > devicetree side, which requires the header being in a shared branch.
> > 
> > Otherwise patch looks great.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Heiko
> > 
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> >> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3368_POWER_H__
> >> +#define __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3368_POWER_H__
> >> +
> >> +/* VD_CORE */
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_L0	0
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_L1	1
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_L2	2
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_L3	3
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_SCU_L		4
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_B0	5
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_B1	6
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_B2	7
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_A53_B3	8
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_SCU_B		9
> >> +
> >> +/* VD_LOGIC */
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_BUS		10
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_PERI		11
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_VIO		12
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_ALIVE		13
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_VIDEO		14
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_GPU_0		15
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_GPU_1		16
> >> +
> >> +/* VD_PMU */
> >> +#define RK3368_PD_PMU		17
> >> +
> >> +#endif