Re: [PATCH 6/6] regulator: max77620: add regulator driver for max77620/max20024

From: Mark Brown
Date: Sun Jan 10 2016 - 07:41:27 EST


On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 08:08:44PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

This looks mostly good, a few fairly small things:

> + if (rinfo->type == MAX77620_REGULATOR_TYPE_SD)
> + addr = rinfo->cfg_addr;

Please write things like this as switch statement so if we end up adding
more variants the code looks more natural.

> + case REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE:
> + case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY:
> + if (rpdata->glpm_enable)
> + power_mode = MAX77620_POWER_MODE_GLPM;
> + else
> + power_mode = MAX77620_POWER_MODE_LPM;
> + break;

If there's no difference between two modes just don't implement one of
the modes and let the framework worry about what to do for the other
one.

> +static int max77620_get_regulator_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct max77620_regulator *max77620_regs)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + u32 prop;
> + int id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + np = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.parent->of_node, "regulators");
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device is not having regulators node\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + pdev->dev.of_node = np;
> +
> + ret = of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, np, max77620_regulator_matches,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(max77620_regulator_matches));
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Parsing of regulator node failed: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }

Don't open code this, use the core support via regulators and of_match.

> + if (reg_pdata->disable_remote_sense_on_suspend &&
> + (rinfo->remote_sense_addr != 0xFF)) {

Weird indentation here, the second line doesn't seem to be aligned with
anything.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature