Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Jan 11 2016 - 17:55:00 EST
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:42:54 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - use subsys_initcall instead of module_init - Paul Gortmaker
That's pretty much the only change between what-i-have and
what-you-sent, so I'll just do this as a delta:
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-introduce-oom-reaper-v4
+++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -32,12 +32,11 @@
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
-#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -542,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init oom_init(void)
}
return 0;
}
-module_init(oom_init)
+subsys_initcall(oom_init)
#else
static void wake_oom_reaper(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
_