Re: [RFC PATCH 18/19] cpufreq: remove transition_lock
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Jan 19 2016 - 14:18:18 EST
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 04:01:55PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Right, read path is fast, but write path still requires some sort of
> locking (malloc, copy and update). So, I'm wondering if this still pays
> off for a structure that gets written a lot.
No, not at all.
struct cpufreq_driver *driver;
void sched_util_change(unsigned int util)
{
struct my_per_cpu_data *foo;
rcu_read_lock();
foo = __this_cpu_ptr(rcu_dereference(driver)->data);
if (foo) {
if (abs(util - foo->last_util) > 10) {
foo->last_util = util;
foo->set_util(util);
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_flip_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *new_driver)
{
struct cpufreq_driver *old_driver;
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
old_driver = driver;
rcu_assign_driver(driver, new_driver);
if (old_driver)
synchronize_rcu();
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
return old_driver;
}