[PATCH 1/3] x86: Honour passed pgprot in track_pfn_insert() and track_pfn_remap()

[Matthew Wilcox]

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

track_pfn_insert() overwrites the pgprot that is passed in with a value
based on the VMA's page_prot.  This is a problem for people trying to
do clever things with the new vm_insert_pfn_prot() as it will simply
overwrite the passed protection flags.  If we use the current value of
the pgprot as the base, then it will behave as people are expecting.

Also fix track_pfn_remap() in the same way.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
index f4ae536..04e2e71 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ int track_pfn_remap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgprot_t *prot,
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	*prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
+	*prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(*prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
 			 cachemode2protval(pcm));
 
 	return 0;
@@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ int track_pfn_insert(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pgprot_t *prot,
 
 	/* Set prot based on lookup */
 	pcm = lookup_memtype(pfn_t_to_phys(pfn));
-	*prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
+	*prot = __pgprot((pgprot_val(*prot) & (~_PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) |
 			 cachemode2protval(pcm));
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.7.0.rc3