RE: [RFC PATCH 10/21] mmc: sdhci: remove SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION
From: Haibo Chen
Date: Wed Jan 27 2016 - 02:11:34 EST
Hi Shawn,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shawn Lin
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 1:08 PM
> To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rpi-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 10/21] mmc: sdhci: remove
> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION
>
> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION is for "broken-cd".
> If we add MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE("non-removeble"), we shoud not add
> "broken-cd" together according to mmc.txt for dt-bingdings. Also, "broken-cd"
> can obtain from mmc_of_parse, which will add MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL into
> mmc->caps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c index
> d622435..b208cb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_card_detection(struct sdhci_host
> *host, bool enable) {
> u32 present;
>
> - if ((host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION) ||
> + if ((host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL) ||
> (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE))
> return;
>
> @@ -1618,7 +1618,8 @@ static int sdhci_do_get_cd(struct sdhci_host *host)
> return 0;
>
> /* If nonremovable, assume that the card is always present. */
> - if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE)
> + if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE ||
> + host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
> return 1;
>
> /*
> @@ -1628,10 +1629,6 @@ static int sdhci_do_get_cd(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(gpio_cd))
> return !!gpio_cd;
>
> - /* If polling, assume that the card is always present. */
> - if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
> - return 1;
Why simply remove these code rather than use this:
If(host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
Return 1;
According to the comment, if polling, need to return 1,
But if you just simply remove this code, it will read the sdhci register SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE
Best Regards
Haibo Chen
> -
> /* Host native card detect */
> return !!(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) &
> SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT); } @@ -2658,7 +2655,7 @@ void
> sdhci_enable_irq_wakeups(struct sdhci_host *host)
> val = sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_WAKE_UP_CONTROL);
> val |= mask ;
> /* Avoid fake wake up */
> - if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
> + if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
> val &= ~(SDHCI_WAKE_ON_INSERT |
> SDHCI_WAKE_ON_REMOVE);
> sdhci_writeb(host, val, SDHCI_WAKE_UP_CONTROL); } @@ -3112,8
> +3109,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (caps[0] & SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
> MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
>
> - if ((host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION) &&
> - !(mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) &&
> + if (!(mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) &&
> IS_ERR_VALUE(mmc_gpio_get_cd(host->mmc)))
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL;
>
> --
> 2.3.7
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html