Re: [PATCH V5 5/5] regulator: max77620: add regulator driver for max77620/max20024

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 28.01.2016 15:24, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> 
> On Thursday 28 January 2016 09:25 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27.01.2016 23:10, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> MAXIM Semiconductor's PMIC, MAX77620 and MAX20024 have the
>>> multiple DCDC and LDOs. This supplies the power to different
>>> components of the system.
>>> Also these rails has configuration for ramp time, flexible
>>> power sequence, slew rate etc.
>>>
>>> Add regulator driver to access these rails via regulator APIs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mallikarjun Kasoju <mkasoju@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes from V1:
>>> - Cleanup code based on comment received on mfd/rtc.
>>> - Avoid duplication on error message.
>>>
>>> Changes form V2:
>>> - Run coccicheck and checkpatch in strict mode for the alignment.
>>> - Refactor Regulator driver to use core API for DT parsing.
>>> - Update based on API changes.
>>>
>>> Changes from V3:
>>> - Change all sys initcall to module driver.
>>> - change the max77620_read argument to unisgned int from u8.
>>>
>>> Changes from V4:
>>> - Added DT binding document as
>>> devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator-max77620.txt
>>> - Detail out properties.
>> What does it mean "Detail out properties"? What have changed>
> 
> Based on review comment from Linus W, I added more description on the
> properties.

Ah, ok.

>> I already reviewed the patchset but because of adding bindings here, you
>> could not add my reviewed-by tag (which makes my effort not tracked...).
> Yaah, This patch include the dt binding and so wanted your review again.
> This si only reason to not add reviewed-by.
> 
> Now I am going to separate out DT binding and driver,  I will add
> reviewed-by tag for you in driver file.

Yeah, but the driver nor the bindings do not change so it really does
not need my additional review.

Best regards,
Krzysztof