Re: [PATCH 00/11] sync framework de-staging: part 1 - clean up

[Gustavo Padovan]

Hi,

2016-01-25 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hey,
> 
> Op 21-01-16 om 13:49 schreef Gustavo Padovan:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following patches are some clean ups on the sync framework before
> > we start the actual de-staging. The main changes here are the move of
> > SW_SYNC_USER to debugfs. Removal of struct sync_pt in favor of direct
> > use of struct fence. And the rename of sync_fence to sync_file, a name
> > to better reflect what it is for, a struct that connects struct fence(s)
> > to a file.
> >
> > Please review. Thanks.
> >
> > Gustavo Padovan (11):
> >   staging/android: fix sync framework documentation
> >   staging/android: sync: remove interfaces that are not used
> >   staging/android: remove not used sync_timeline ops
> >   staging/android: create a 'sync' dir for debugfs information
> >   staging/android: move SW_SYNC_USER to a debugfs file
> >   staging/android: rename sync_fence to sync_file
> >   staging/android: rename 'sync_pt' to 'fence' in struct sync_fence_cb
> >   staging/android: remove struct sync_pt
> >   staging/android: remove unused var from sync_timeline_signal()
> >   staging/android: remove pointless sync_timeline_signal at destroy
> >     phase
> >   staging/android: remove sync_fence_create_dma()
> >
> For whole series:
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Renaming sync_fence to sync_file makes sense, it should hopefully reduce confusion.

Poke. What is missing for this to go upstream? Do I need more review
here? Thanks.

	Gustavo