Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add mipi dsi support for rk3288
From: Xinliang Liu
Date: Wed Feb 24 2016 - 04:38:36 EST
On 8 February 2016 at 18:12, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/06/2016 09:33 AM, Chris Zhong wrote:
>>
>>
>> The rk3288 MIPI DSI is a Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller
>> IP. This series adds support for a Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host
>> controller DRM driver.
>>
>> The MIPI DSI feature is tested on rk3288 evb board, backport them to
>> chrome os kernel chrome_v3.14, and it can display normally.
>>
>> This patchset is base on the patchset from Ying.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg77181.html>
>>
>> According to the suggestion from Thierry, I have get rid of the bridge,
>> and register the encoder & connecter in drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c.
>
>
> I've raised this question too late, but what was the reason to not
> implement the DSI block as a bridge driver?
>
> The drm/hisilicon IP seems to use a very similar DSI Designware IP (the
> register offsets seems to be the same). There is a good potential of
> re-use here by different kms drivers here the way it's already done for
> DW HDMI and the analogix DP driver that's in review process.
yes, Hisilicon's hi6220 SoC use a Designware DSI Controller IP similar
to rockchip.
Maybe the version number is different.
I notice this recently when I am doing the upstream of hi6220's DRM driver.
And I have a look at Ying liu's original patches. It seems that it is
implemented in bridge.
His patches were sent in the early of last year, I can't get all the
background easily.
I wonder why his patches was not accecpted? What's the problem? And
why Thierry suggested get rid of bridge?
Thanks,
-xinliang
>
> Archit
>
>
>> After backport below patches from linux-next, I can merge this serial into
>> Dave's drm-next branch.
>>
>> 94d5d6a0fbf3 clk: rockchip: add an id for rk3288 crypto clk
>> c6d49fbcfcc4 clk: rockchip: add id for mipidsi sclk on rk3288
>> a2f4c560f18e clk: rockchip: add mipidsi clock on rk3288
>> 69c923743640 ARM: dts: rockchip: correct the name of REG8 for
>> rk3288-evb-act8846
>> 662513a14c9d ARM: dts: rockchip: add 2 regulators for rk3288-evb-act8846
>> b04061e6599b ARM: dts: rockchip: move the public part to rk3288-evb common
>>
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>> - modify the config to tristate for modules build (Mark Yao)
>> - Pass NULL 'name' to drm_encoder_init() to fix compile err (Mark Yao)
>> - Move the lcd_en control to act8846 dts
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>> - update the document, since the bridge device has been deleted.
>> - move the mipi_en gate to ockchip_drm_crtc_mode_config
>> - Remove the atomic feature check (Mark Yao)
>> - Add atomic API support (Heiko StÃbne)
>> - Do not use bridge driver (Thierry Reding)
>> - Optimization the phy init sequence
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> - modify the clk name to SCLK_MIPIDSI_24M
>> - add a blank line befor lcd_en
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - use clk_round_rate to check the clock rate in vop_crtc_mode_fixup
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - move dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt to bindings/display/rockchip/
>>
>> Chris Zhong (5):
>> drm/rockchip: return a true clock rate to adjusted_mode
>> Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for rk3288 DW MIPI DSI driver
>> drm: rockchip: Support Synopsys DW MIPI DSI
>> ARM: dts: rockchip: add rk3288 mipi_dsi nodes
>> ARM: dts: rockchip: add support mipi panel tv080wum-nl0
>>
>> .../display/rockchip/dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt | 60 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb-act8846.dts | 2 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-evb.dtsi | 12 +-
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 39 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 1196
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 8 +
>> 8 files changed, 1327 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
>>
>
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation